Obama’s Gateway Drug
What’s the deal and all the hype about Barack Obama smoking? Why is this such a big problem to anyone? I can understand the risks smoking can cause to some people, but does that mean we should dictate to our new president what he can and can not do in his own home? Is this “Operation Nanny State?” I never got the memo that smoking cigarettes was against the law! When did that happen? How long have I been asleep?
If smoking is President Elect Obama’s only vice, I’d say he’s doing pretty damn good! Especially since “W” had to quit drinking! There is a big difference between drinking and smoking, don’t you think? Do you think that “W” slipped up and knocked back a few strong ones while he had to make decisions about foreign and domestic policy? Maybe that’s what happened! Maybe President Bush fell off the wagon for a while, and in a drunken stupor wrote the “Bush Doctrine,” and when he woke up from his blackout, said “I did what?”
So what is everyone afraid of? Are cigarettes the new presidential “gateway drug?” If he starts smoking again, is he just a short step or two from purchasing a bong, hanging out in the Oval Office with Rahm Emanuel while watching “Harold and Kumar; Escape from Guantanamo Bay” to get ideas on how to shut that place shut down? Will he tell Michelle to get him and Rahm some Doritos and pizza and make a late night beer run? And since cigarettes can be a gateway drug, does the next logical step mean Obama would set up a meth lab in his new house and start dealing to the secret service, children and pregnant women? I think people need to get a life! Smoking is not illegal, so why treat him as though it were? Maybe people need something to pick on…especially people who don’t smoke. I was on a few other sites and I read the story about how Obama quit smoking but had a few slip ups, and I was amazed at the people who left comments. One person said, “yeah, he should quit smoking because it’s disgusting to kiss someone that has just smoked a cigarette.” Huh? Was this man planning on kicking up some kind of midnight rendezvous with the new president and his desire was for Obama’s mouth to be “minty fresh?” Others had more heartfelt concerns, such as “I hope he stays healthy and doesn’t start smoking again, for the sake of his family.” That makes sense to me, but it doesn’t mean people should dictate what he does within the dynamics of his family life.
I wonder if people are afraid of the kind of message it sends to the youth of this country. Maybe the fear is
that if young people see President Obama is smoking, then that means it’s ok for them to smoke too. Do you think that could be it? Could it be smoking cigarettes would tempt young boys and girls to “light up” and be like their president? Do you think they would feel it was “so cool” they run out and ask an 18 year old to buy them some? Or perhaps go into their parent’s room and steal a couple? (Remember, research suggests that cigarettes are a gateway drug!) And of course that leads children down the dark road of smoking pot, doing crack, tapping the vein for some heroin, and starting their very own meth enterprise from their parent’s basement. If that’s the case, then what shall we say about President Bush? What kind of influence has he had over our children? I can name a few…how about jumping to conclusions about people we don’t know a lot about because they may look and act differently than us. How about rushing to judgement before knowing all the facts, and causing heart ache to those families both here and abroad. What about torturing our enemies, and bending the rules to serve his own purpose? How about not listening to wise council? And does not learning to get along with others have any influence over our children? How about turning a blind eye to the poor and speaking on behalf of the ultra rich? Humm? I’d say this president has influenced our children in a lot of ways, and not for the good. Maybe Obama can do it better…even if he decides to light up again.





Y on Wed, 10th Dec 2008 2:00 pm
You are one smart cookie girl! Excellent writing. Some keen observations you made there. Perhaps they are afraid that Obama’s smoking could potentially be shortening his life, and by doing so he could cause himself some life threatening illness which would leave the country Obamaless. Could that be it? Nah, people just have nothing better to do than complain about what others do.
Great Article.
admin on Wed, 10th Dec 2008 3:08 pm
That’s not what I heard! I heard that if the country all the sudden became “Obamaless” that he would rise again in three days!
Or at least that’s what what the opposition jokes about!
John J Savo, the Authoring Auctioneer on Thu, 11th Dec 2008 10:33 pm
Smoking is dangerous. Soon after I started lighting up, I became sarcastic, cynical, and mean. Today, if it weren’t for tobacco, I would be a happier, more laid back guy. I wouldn’t be filled with such pessimism and so prone to satirical rants. Damn you, Camel Joe!
Angela on Thu, 11th Dec 2008 10:39 pm
Ah Mr. Savo! I wouldn’t have you any other way!
Smoke up Johnny!
AngieSS on Thu, 18th Dec 2008 3:25 pm
Cigarettes? A gateway drug? Wow, I knew I was a slacker, but I better get on the ball to building my Meth lab. I suppose after 27 years of smoking it’s about time I started the stronger stuff!
Great article!
Angela on Thu, 18th Dec 2008 4:11 pm
Angie, don’t forget to have a great name for your meth lab enterprise:
Tweaker City
Crib Cartel Unlimited
Free Base Babes Inc.
Bobby Revell on Mon, 29th Dec 2008 12:45 am
Hi Angela! I apologize for not coming by sooner, but I’ve had Christmas company for five days. As a reformed abuser of many, many, many illicit chemical substates–I believe there’s no such thing as a gateway drug. There are people who’ll try things and get hooked, or maybe try more powerful things–and there are those who never get hooked or maybe even try it. For that matter, beer is a gateway drug. How about, “It’s the governments fault I did cocaine, all because of my original and very legal first gateway cigarette.”
Yeah, I don’t care if Obama smokes. It beats killing hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children because of false intelligence. Perhaps if hell is real, Bush will be there scorching beneath the most searing coals with a pitchfork in his skull.
Though I do not believe drugs are good, and they destroy lives, I believe they should all be decriminalized. There should never be a human being locked in prison because they got high. How can you be punished for committing a crime against yourself? It’s ridiculous. Murder is and will always be far worse than smoking a joint.
Angela on Mon, 29th Dec 2008 1:19 am
Hi Bobby,
I hope you had an awesome time with your family over Christmas. Is there a part of you that always wants to take a peek at what’s going on online? I think I’m getting too addicted to the internet…thank god that’s not a crime huh?
You have touched upon a well debated nerve within society; decriminalizing drugs! I believe the bottom line IS the bottom line with both pharmaceutical companies and with the government. What would pharmaceutical companies do if everyone started “self medicating” and how does the government begin to tax savvy drug dealers? The government has already broached the subject of enforcing a “crack tax.” It’s all about the “Benjamins!”
It looks all the same to me, honestly. Pharmaceutical companies are just legal drug cartels.
Do I advocate doing drugs…nope. I agree with you that a person should not be locked up because they got high and that murder is and always will be worse than smoking a joint.